Non-Traditional Roles of Military Actors: NATO’s Engagement in Natural Disaster Response

Authors

  • Marija Popović Mančević University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, Cara Dušana 196 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.6

Keywords:

crisis management, humanitarian assistance, natural disasters, identity, NATO.

Abstract

Historically, the primary purpose of military alliances has been to secure state sovereignty and provide collective defence against external armed threats. The events of the Cold War shaped the trajectory of NATO as a leading military alliance, with the principal task of developing and maintaining the capacity to defend against attacks from the opposing bloc. This task determined the course of the alliance's development during the Cold War, aimed at strengthening military capabilities and ensuring readiness to mount a collective response to any aggression against its members. However, the dissolution of the rival bloc and the changing nature of security threats in the post-Cold War period compelled NATO to shift from a military alliance to a broader political and military forum, maintaining its relevance and justifying its continuity. While NATO has increasingly assumed the role of a political coalition, its military capability still represents its core strength. Nevertheless, its use is now linked to a broader spectrum of practices than during the Cold War, including humanitarian responses to natural disasters and other emergencies. This paper aims to examine one of NATO’s post-Cold War roles, specifically its engagement in crisis response operations triggered by natural disasters, and to demonstrate that this practice has become an integral part of NATO’s contemporary identity. Methodologically, the paper combines content analysis of NATO documents with two case studies. The findings indicate that both the internal and external NATO identity, grounded in its operational roles, have evolved. Member states, partner countries, and international organisations no longer perceive NATO solely as a defensive alliance but also as an actor to which they turn to address complex crises, including those triggered by natural disasters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bergsman S. (2001). The Concept of Military Alliance. In: E. Reiter, H. Gartner (eds). Small States and Alliances, pp. 25−37. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.

2. Ciuta F. (2002). The End(s) of NATO: Security, Strategic Action and Narrative Transformation. Contemporary Security Policy, 23(1), 35−62. https://doi.org/10.1080/713999727.

3. Crisis Management, NATO, retrieved from http://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/topics_49192.htm.

4. Dinerstein S. H. (1965). The Transformation of Alliance Systems. The American Political Science Review, 59(3), 589−601.

5. EADRCC (July 17, 2017). Request for Assistance − Forest and wild fires in Montenegro, OPS(EADRCC)(2017)0156, 16:00 UTC, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_07/20170718_OPS-EADRCC-2017-0156.pdf.

6. EADRCC (July 22, 2014). Situation Report No. 10 (final) Bosnia and Herzegovina – Floods, OPS(EADRCC)(2014)0033, 14:45 UTC, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/eadrcc/2014/05-bih-floods/docs/ops-eadrcc-2014-0033.pdf.

7. EADRCC (July 25, 2017). Situation Report #5 (FINAL) − Forest and wild fires in Montenegro, OPS(EADRCC)(2017)0166, 14:15 UTC, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_07/20170725_OPS-EADRCC-2017-0166.pdf.

8. EADRCC (May 15, 2014). Urgent Disaster Assistance Request Bosnia and Herzegovina – Floods, OPS(EADRCC) (2014)0019, 21:50 UTC, retrieved form: https://www.nato.int/eadrcc/2014/05-bih-floods/docs/ops-eadrcc-2014-0019.pdf.

9. European Commission (2014). Floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina, ECHO Joint Assessment Report, Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection, pp. 1−10.

10. European Commission (2014). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Support to Civil Society in awareness raising, advocacy and recovery assistance to flood affected areas, Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA II) 2014–2020.

11. European Commission (2014, June 6). Floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina, ECHO Joint Assessment Report, Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/news/bosnia_herzegovina_floods_joint_report_en.pdf.

12. Fedder H. E. (1968). The Concept of Alliance. International Studies Quarterly, 12(1), 65−86. doi:10.2307/3013558.

13. Flockhart T. (2011). NATO and the (re)constitution of Roles: “Self,” “we,” and “other”? In: S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. W. Maull (eds), Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and analyses (pp. 95−112). Routledge, New York.

14. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (2014). Bosnia and Herzegovina Floods 2014: Recovery needs assessment, retrieved from: https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/BiH-rna-report.pdf.

15. IOM (2025). EU Flood Recovery: Housing assistance in progress, new Call for farmers opens on 7 April, April 4, 2025, retrieved from: https://bih.iom.int/news/eu-flood-recovery-housing-assistance-progress-new-call-farmers-opens-7-april.

16. Jacuch, A. (2019). Disaster response mechanisms in EU and NATO, Przegląd Europejski, 2019(3), 67–81. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5842.

17. Jochems, M. (2006). NАТО’s Growing Humanitarian Role, NATO Review, 1, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2006/03/01/nato-s-growing-humanitarian-role/index.html.

18. Lawrence K. P. (1996). State, Hegemony and Ideology: The Role of Intelectuals. Political Studies, XLIV, 44−59.

19. Moore R. R. (2007). NATO’s New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post–Cold War World. Praeger Security International.

20. NATO (2015). Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre (EADRCC) – Operations, retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_117901.htm?selectedLocale=en.

21. NATO (2024). Civil Preparedness, retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49158.htm.

22. NATO (August 24, 2017). Remarks by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the 38th Meeting for Friendship amongst Peoples in Rimini, Italy, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_146470.htm?selectedLocale=en.

23. NATO (February 2, 2017). Speech by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to university students in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_140517.htm?selectedLocale=en.

24. NATO (July 19, 2017). NATO provides swift forest fire assistance to new Ally Montenegro, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_146283.htm?selectedLocale=en.

25. NATO (May 29, 2017). Speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Rose Gottemoeller at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly session, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_144090.htm?selectedLocale=en.

26. NATO (October 12, 2017). Belgrade Security Forum panel discussion ''NATO-Serbia Partnership Contributing to Western Balkans Security'' with NATO Deputy Secretary General Rose Gottemoeller and Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabic, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_147839.htm.

27. NATO (September 24–28, 2017). EADRCC consequence management field exercise ''Bosna i Hercegovina 2017'', Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_140528.htm

28. NATO (September 25, 2017). NATO and partners exercise disaster response in Bosnia and Herzegovina, retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_147118.htm?selectedLocale=en.

29. NATO 2022 Strategic Concept, Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Madrid on 29 June 2022.

30. Roper J. (1999). NATO's new role in crisis management, The International Spectator, 34(2), 51−61. doi:10.1080/03932729908456863.

31. Sarajevo Times (2014). Help in Equipment from NATO and USAID to Civil Protection of RS, May 20, 2014, retrieved from: https://sarajevotimes.com/help-equipment-nato-usaid-civil-protection-rs/.

32. The North Atlantic Organization (1949). The North Atlantic Treaty, Washington, retrieved form: http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/stock_publications/20120822_nato_treaty_en_light_2009.pdf.

33. Vijesti (2017). Government of Montenegro: Firefighters worked without adequate support from municipalities, July 20, 2017, retrieved from: https://en.vijesti.me/news-b/politika/71780/the-government-and-the-firefighters-worked-without-adequate-support-from-the-municipalities.

34. Vijesti (2017). Zoikas: Montenegrin authorities did a great job during the disaster on October 1, 2017. Retrieved from: https://en.vijesti.me/news-b/politika/71780/the-government-and-the-firefighters-worked-without-adequate-support-from-the-municipalities.

35. Walt M. S. (1997). Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 39(1), 156−179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339708442901

36. Williams C. M. & Neumann B. I. (2000). From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia and the Power of Identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 357−387. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2025

Issue

Section

International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies

How to Cite

Popović Mančević, M. (2025). Non-Traditional Roles of Military Actors: NATO’s Engagement in Natural Disaster Response. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.6

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.