Social License to Operate: Where Are You? The Role of Risk Communication in Raw Material Extraction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.5Keywords:
social license to operate, social acceptance, risk communication, raw material extraction, literature reviewAbstract
Europe is not only concerned with the availability of raw materials but also with their sustainable extraction and use, as outlined in the Critical Raw Materials Act. The trend towards raw material extraction in Europe, aimed at achieving independence during politically turbulent times, is increasingly challenged by issues with citizens and citizen initiatives, which are hindering such projects. The absence of social acceptance, or the so-called social licence to operate, is becoming a significant challenge in this area, raising the question of how impactful effective communication could be. Through a discourse analytical literature review, this study examines the role of communication in the realm of social acceptance, specifically analysing the cases of Rio Tinto Jadar in Serbia and Koralpe/Weinebene in Austria. Both cases pertain to lithium mining projects that have thus far been thwarted by a lack of social acceptance. The results indicate that comprehensive sustainability measures aligned with ESG criteria influence the acceptance of such projects, as does the utilisation of new media (social media channels). Technically legitimate projects can falter if there is a deficiency in responsible communication. It is important to understand the cultural context to avoid encountering new obstacles in communication efforts. The findings underscore that the successful implementation of raw material projects increasingly relies on securing a social licence to operate that is both culturally informed and responsive to the dynamics of digital communication.
Downloads
References
1. Adey, E. A., Shail, R. K., Wall, F., Varul, M., Whitbread-Abrutat, P., Baciu, C., Udachin, V. (2011). Corporate social responsibility within the mining industry: Case studies from across Europe and Russia. In (pp. 153–170). Aachen University. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1011206
2. Agudo‐Valiente, J. M., Garcés‐Ayerbe, C., & Salvador‐Figueras, M. (2015). Corporate Social Performance and Stakeholder Dialogue Management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1324
3. Anderson, C., Schirmer, J., & Abjorensen, N. (2012). Exploring CCS community acceptance and public participation from a human and social capital perspective. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(6), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9312-z
4. Ansu-Mensah, P., Marfo, E. O., Awuah, L. S., & Amoako, K. O. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder engagement in Ghana’s mining sector: a case study of Newmont Ahafo mines. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-020-00054-2
5. Ashworth, P., Rodriguez, S., & Miller, A. (2010). Case Study of the CO2CRC Otway Project. CSIRO. https://doi.org/10.5341/RPT10-2362
6. ASX European Lithium Limited (2023, March 8). Wolfsberg Lithium Project Definitive Feasibility Study Results. Retrieved from https://europeanlithium.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/230308-DFS-Announcement_FINAL.pdf
7. Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression ,. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316–330.
8. Barakos, G., & Mischo, H. (2021). Insertion of the social license to operate into the early evaluation of technical and economic aspects of mining projects: Experiences from the Norra Kärr and Bokan Dotson rare earth element projects. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(2), 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.09.008
9. Beta (2024, September 11). Đilas: U Srbiji se litijum neće kopati, tri četvrtine ljudi je protiv toga. N1. Retrieved from https://n1info.rs/vesti/djilas-u-srbiji-se-litijum-nece-kopati-tri-cetvrtine-ljudi-je-protiv-toga/
10. Bezzola, S., Günther, I., Brugger, F., & Lefoll, E. (2022). CSR and local conflicts in African mining communities. World Development, 158, 105968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105968
11. Bibienne, T., Magnan, J.‑F., Rupp, A., & Laroche, N. (2020). From Mine to Mind and Mobiles: Society’s Increasing Dependence on Lithium. Elements, 16(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.16.4.265
12. Blake-Persen, N. (2024, November 8). Lithium mine project in Serbia triggers mass protests – DW – 08/11/2024. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/lithium-mine-project-in-serbia-triggers-mass-protests/video-69912368
13. Blenkinsop, P. (2024, May 15). Winning over public key to EU's mineral supply push, says industry. Reuters Media. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/winning-over-public-key-eus-mineral-supply-push-says-industry-2024-05-15/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
14. Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32, 257–286. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412
15. Bourdieu Pierre (2005). Die verborgenen Mechanismen der Macht. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.
16. Brantly, A. F. (2021). Risk and uncertainty can be analyzed in cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyab001
17. Bryson, D., & Atwal, G. (2019). Brand hate: the case of Starbucks in France. British Food Journal, 121(1), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0194
18. Cesar, S., & Jhony, O. (2021). Making or breaking social license to operate in the mining industry: Factors of the main drivers of social conflict. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123640
19. Chaudhuri, N., Gupta, G., Bagherzadeh, M., Daim, T., & Yalcin, H. (2024). Misinformation on social platforms: A review and research Agenda. Technology in Society, 78, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102654
20. Chaves, C., Pereira, E., Ferreira, P., & Guerner Dias, A. (2021). Concerns about lithium extraction: A review and application for Portugal✰. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(3), 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100928
21. Ciftci, M. M., & Lemaire, X. (2023). Deciphering the impacts of ‘green’ energy transition on socio-environmental lithium conflicts: Evidence from Argentina and Chile. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16, 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101373
22. Conde, M., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(3), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.04.009
23. Cruz (2021). Measuring the social license to operate of the mining industry in an Amazonian town: a case study of Canaã dos Carajás. Brazil. Resour. Policy, 74.
24. Daemi, A., Chugh, R., & Kanagarajoo, M. V. (2020). Social media in project management: A systematic narrative literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 8(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm080401
25. Dagvadorj, L., Byamba, B., & Ishikawa, M. (2018). Effect of Local Community’s Environmental Perception on Trust in a Mining Company: A Case Study in Mongolia. Sustainability, 10(3), 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030614
26. Dall-Orsoletta, A., Verrier, B., Uriona-Maldonado, M., Dranka, G. G., & Ferreira, P. (2025). How does social acceptance affect transition minerals production in Europe? A system dynamics approach and case study in Portugal. The Extractive Industries and Society, 22, 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101625
27. Dare, M., Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.927108
28. Denktaş-Şakar, G., & Sürücü, E. (2020). Stakeholder engagement via social media: an analysis of third-party logistics companies. The Service Industries Journal, 40(11-12), 866–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1561874
29. Dhaoui, C., & Webster, C. M. (2021). Brand and consumer engagement behaviors on Facebook brand pages: Let's have a (positive) conversation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.06.005
30. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
31. DLA Piper (2021, May 28). Lithium-Förderung in Kärnten: Umweltschutz ein wichtiger Punkt. Retrieved from https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20210528_OTS0095/lithium-foerderung-in-kaernten-umweltschutz-ein-wichtiger-punkt
32. Domingues, N. (2022). Lithium Prospection in Portugal for E-Mobility and Solar PV Expansion. Commodities, 1(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities1020007
33. Dunne, C., & Ustundag, B. G. (2020). Successfully Managing the Literature Review and Write-up Process When Using Grounded Theory Methodology—A Dialogue in Exploration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.1.3338
34. Eerola, T., & Komnitsas, K. Preliminary Assessment of Social License to Operate (SLO) and Corporate Communication in Four European Lithium Projects. In RawMat 2023 (p. 35). Basel Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015035
35. Endl, A. (2017). Addressing “Wicked Problems” through Governance for Sustainable Development—A Comparative Analysis of National Mineral Policy Approaches in the European Union. Sustainability, 9(10), 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101830
36. Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood (n.d.). Serbia. Retrieved from https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/serbia_en
37. Esposito, P., & Ricci, P. (2021). Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2074
38. European Commission (2022, December 2). Serbia Overview Map (December 2022). Retrieved from https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-12/Serbia_12.22.jpg
39. European Lithium Limited (2024, November 28). Bescheid der Kärntner Landesregierung bestätigt: Lithium-Projekt Wolfsberg nicht UVP-pflichtig. Retrieved from https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20241128_OTS0102/bescheid-der-kaerntner-landesregierung-bestaetigt-lithium-projekt-wolfsberg-nicht-uvp-pflichtig
40. Fan, Y. (2010). Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.16
41. Farrell, L. A., Hamann, R., & Mackres, E. (2012). A clash of cultures (and lawyers): Anglo Platinum and mine-affected communities in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Resources Policy, 37(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.003
42. Futurzone (2023, July 30). Lithium aus Kärnten: Erzabbau soll 2025 beginnen [Lithium from Carinthia: Ore mining to begin in 2025]. Futurezone.At. Retrieved from https://futurezone.at/b2b/lithium-kaernten-erzabbau-koralm-2025-wolfsberg-huerde-beginn-wann-rohstoff-european-lithium/402540629
43. Gaisch-faustmann, H., & Sommersguter, U. (2023, May 18). Lithium-Abbau in Kärnten und der Steiermark: Was hinter den Plänen steckt [Lithium mining in Carinthia and Styria: what's behind the plans]. Https://www.Kleinezeitung.At. Retrieved from https://www.kleinezeitung.at/wirtschaft/6289197/Wolfsberg-hat-hoechste-Prioritaet_LithiumAbbau-in-Kaernten-und-der
44. Galjak, M., & Budić, M. (2024). Public perceptions of fossil and alternative energy in Serbia: Between NIMBYism and nationalism. Energy Policy, 190, 114137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114137
45. Giebel, K., & Sydow, J. (2022). The Raw Materials Situation in Neighboring European Countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Georgia, Armenia. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Retrieved from https://greenalt.org/app/uploads/2024/08/The-Raw-Materials-Situation-in-Neighboring-European-Countries.pdf https://doi.org/10.18449/2022ZS01
46. Gourcerol, B., Gloaguen, E., Melleton, J., Tuduri, J., & Galiegue, X. (2019). Re-assessing the European lithium resource potential – A review of hard-rock resources and metallogeny. Ore Geology Reviews, 109, 494–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.015
47. Groenewegen, P., & Moser, C. (2024). Online Communities: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Network Research. In S. Clegg, M. Grothe-Hammer, & K. S. Velarde (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Sociological Thinking in Contemporary Organizational Scholarship (Vol. 40, pp. 463–477). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040023
48. Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Impact of corporate social responsibility on reputation—Insights from tweets on sustainable development goals by CEOs. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.009
49. Grunow, H.‑W., & Zender, C. (2020). Green Finance. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
50. Hannigan, T. R., Haans, R. F. J., Vakili, K., Tchalian, H., Glaser, V. L., Wang, M. S., . . . Jennings, P. D. (2019). Topic Modeling in Management Research: Rendering New Theory from Textual Data. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 586–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0099
51. Hoisl, T. (2023, December 27). Lithium aus der Kärntner Koralpe: "Wer das Geld gibt, bekommt die Beute" [Lithium from the Carinthian Koralpe: ‘Whoever gives the money gets the spoils’]. Die Zeit Österreich. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/2023/54/lithium-kaerntner-koralpe-saudi-arabien
52. Houston, D. J., Aitalieva, N. R., Morelock, A. L., & Shults, C. A. (2016). Citizen Trust in Civil Servants: A Cross-National Examination. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(14), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1156696
53. Huang, N., & Ge, L. (2024). Mining and indigenous communities in Southeast Asia: Examining the social impact of mineral development. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101363
54. Hysa, B., & Spalek, S. (2019). Opportunities and threats presented by social media in project management. Heliyon, 5(4), e01488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01488
55. Insajder (2022, May 10). Insajder serijal: „Rio Tinto u Srbiji: Potraga za blagom - bez pravila”, prvi deo [Rio Tinto in Serbia: Treasure hunt – no rules, part one [Video series]. Insider TV.]. Retrieved from https://www.insajder.net/teme/insajder-serijal-rio-tinto-u-srbiji-potraga-za-blagom-bez-pravila-prvi-deo
56. Institut für empirische Sozialforschung (2016). Rohstoffgewinnung: Gesamtbericht (No. Archivnummer 23805 003). Retrieved from https://www.forumrohstoffe.at/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Rohstoffgewinnung_Gesamtbericht_IFES_2016-05-18.pdf
57. Ivanović, S., Tomićević-Dubljević, J., Bjedov, I., & Đorđević, I. (2021). Contemporary concept of landscape management: Participation as a management paradigm. Zastita Prirode, 70(1-2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5937/ZasPri2101041I
58. Ivanović, S., Tomićević-Dubljević, J., Bjedov, I., Đorđević, I., & Živojinović, I. (2023). Cultural landscape management in context: Local communities' perceptions under Jadar mineral extraction project in Serbia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16, 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101361
59. Johnson, C. A., Clavijo, A., Lorca, M., & Andrade, M. O. (2024). Bringing the state back in the lithium triangle: An institutional analysis of resource nationalism in Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 20, 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101534
60. Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
61. Johnston (2018). Engagement as communication: Pathways, possibilities, and future directions.
62. Joint Research Centre (2024). Cross-border and emerging risks in Europe: Overview of state of science, knowledge and capacity. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Retrieved from https://civil-protection-knowledge-network.europa.eu/system/files/2024-06/JRC137818_01.pdf https://doi.org/10.2760/184302
63. Josipović, B. (04/2025). Statistical Pocketbook of the Republic of Serbia, 2025 (G. Nedeljković, Trans.). Retrieved from https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2025/PdfE/G202517018.pdf
64. Jovanović, N. (2024, July 25). Objavljene sve lokacije gde se tražio litijum, rudnici planirani u blizini Čačka - Ozonpress. Ozon Press. Retrieved from https://www.ozonpress.net/ekonomija/objavljene-sve-lokacije-gde-se-trazio-litijum-rudnici-planirani-u-blizini-cacka/
65. Kakl, H. (2025, May 15). Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung für Lithium-Abbau im Lavanttal ist nicht erforderlich, sagen Experten [Environmental impact assessment for lithium mining in Lavanttal is not required, say experts]. Retrieved from https://unterkaerntner.at/wirtschaft/ueberregional/umweltvertraeglichkeitspruefung-fuer-lithium-abbau-im-lavanttal-ist-nicht-erforderlich-sagen-experten/
66. Kanagarajoo, M. V., Fulford, R., & Standing, C. (2020). The contribution of social media to project management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(4), 834–872. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2018-0316
67. Kis‐Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Corruption in S outheast A sia: a survey of recent research. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 27(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12004
68. Kivinen, S., Kotilainen, J., & Kumpula, T. (2020). Mining conflicts in the European Union: environmental and political perspectives. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 198(1-2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.87223
69. Kovačević, M. (10/2023). Statistički godišnjak Republike Srbije 2023 (V. Aralica, K. Kaličanin & G. Nedeljković, Trans.) [Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Serbia 2023]. Retrieved from https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2023/pdf/G20232056.pdf
70. Kowalik, K. (2021). Social media as a distribution of emotions, not participation. Polish exploratory study in the EU smart city communication context. Cities, 108, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102995
71. Kowasch, M., Batterbury, S. P. J., Baumann, C., Melcher, F., Saxinger, G., & Wilson, E. (2025). Not in my backyard? Prospects, problems and perceptions of lithium extraction in Austria. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00521-3
72. Kumar, G., Narducci, F., & Bakshi, S. (2022). Knowledge Transfer and Crowdsourcing in Cyber-Physical-Social Systems. Pattern Recognition Letters, 164, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.10.027
73. Leiss, W., & Larkin, P. (2019). Risk communication and public engagement in CCS projects: the foundations of public acceptability. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 22(3/4), 384. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2019.103339
74. Lesser, P., Gugerell, K., Poelzer, G., Hitch, M., & Tost, M. (2021). European mining and the social license to operate. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(2), 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.07.021
75. Lobo, S., & Abid, A. F. (2020). The Role of Social Media in Intrastakeholder Strategies to Influence Decision Making in a UK Infrastructure Megaproject: Crossrail 2. Project Management Journal, 51(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819864456
76. Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and Power. Chichester West Sussex: Wiley.
77. Mangioni, V. (2018). Evaluating the impact of the land acquisition phase on property owners in megaprojects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(1), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2017-0090
78. Margeson, K. (2023, June 2). Part 1: Social license, what is it and why does it matter? Retrieved from https://blogs.dal.ca/openthink/part-1-social-license-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter/
79. Marković, M. (2025, May 14). Ko su glavni igrači u biznisu istraživanja ruda u Srbiji [Who are the main players in the mineral exploration business in Serbia?]. Retrieved from https://birn.rs/ko-su-glavni-igraci-u-biznisu-istrazivanja-ruda-u-srbiji
80. Marshall (2023). Vale in Mozambique: creator and destroyer of jobs, livelihoods and communities. Extr. Ind. Soc., 13.
81. Matthew E. Brashears, & Eric Quintane (2018). The weakness of tie strength. Social Networks, 55, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.010
82. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
83. McGookin, C., Ó Gallachóir, B., & Byrne, E. (2021). Participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111504
84. Men, L. R., Tsai, W.‑H. S., Chen, Z. F., & Ji, Y. G. (2018). Social presence and digital dialogic communication: engagement lessons from top social CEOs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498341
85. Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. (2018). Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
86. Metzger, I. (2018, July 10). Gold der Zukunft: Kärntner Lithium-Mine vor Start. Kurier. Retrieved from https://kurier.at/wirtschaft/gold-der-zukunft-kaerntner-lithium-mine-vor-start/400063871
87. Michl, S. (2024, August 18). Koralm: So steht es um den umstrittenen Lithium-Abbau auf der Weinebene - Deutschlandsberg [Koralm: This is the situation regarding the controversial lithium mining on the Weinebene - Deutschlandsberg]. MeinBezirk.At. Retrieved from https://www.meinbezirk.at/deutschlandsberg/c-lokales/so-steht-es-um-den-umstrittenen-lithium-abbau-auf-der-weinebene_a6847723?ref=curate
88. Mishrif, A., & Khan, A. (2023). Clean Energy Transition through the Sustainable Exploration and Use of Lithium in Oman: Potential and Challenges. Sustainability, 15(20), 15173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015173
89. Mulyasari, F., Harahap, A. K., Rio, A. O., Sule, R., & Kadir, W. (2021). Potentials of the public engagement strategy for public acceptance and social license to operate: Case study of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage Gundih Pilot Project in Indonesia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103312
90. Muninger, M.‑I., Mahr, D., & Hammedi, W. (2022). Social media use: A review of innovation management practices. Journal of Business Research, 143, 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.039
91. Mutti, D., Yakovleva, N., Vazquez-Brust, D., & Di Marco, M. H. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resources Policy, 37(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.001
92. N. A. (2024, December 2). Critical Metals’ Wolfsberg lithium project to get fast-tracked without EIA. Retrieved from https://www.mining.com/critical-metals-wolfsberg-lithium-project-to-get-fast-tracked-without-eia/
93. Nikola (2023, June 14). Serbian NGOs feasibility and ESIA analysis against Rio Tinto lithium Jadar mine. Serbia SEE Energy Mining News. Retrieved from https://serbia-energy.eu/serbian-ngos-feasibility-and-esia-analysis-against-rio-tinto-lithium-jadar-mine/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
94. Ninan, J., Clegg, S., & Mahalingam, A. (2019). Branding and governmentality for infrastructure megaprojects: The role of social media. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.005
95. Ninan, J., & Sergeeva, N. (2022). Battle of narratives: Interaction between narratives and counter-narratives in megaprojects. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100069
96. O.A. (2025, May 8). Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj
97. Obradović, S., Stojanović, V., & Milić, D. (2023). The Importance of Understanding Local Community Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Nature Conservation. Wetlands, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01652-5
98. OECD (2022). OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes. OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/f765caf6-en
99. Paragreen, N., & Woodley, A. (2013). Social licence to operate and the coal seam gas industry: What can be learnt from already established mining operations? Rural Society, 23(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.2013.23.1.46
100. Perrone, A., Inam, A., Albano, R., Adamowski, J., & Sole, A. (2020). A participatory system dynamics modeling approach to facilitate collaborative flood risk management: A case study in the Bradano River (Italy). Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124354
101. Pflügl, J. (2023, May 17). Australier sichern sich weitere drei Lithium-Stätten in Österreich [Australians secure another three lithium sites in Austria]. DER STANDARD. Retrieved from https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000146476044/australier-krallen-sich-weiteredrei-lithium-vorkommen-in-oesterreich
102. Pflügl, J., & Hahn, A. (2025, March 4). Lithium aus Kärnten: Betreiber werben mit fragwürdigen Aussagen [Lithium from Carinthia: Operators advertise with questionable statements]. DER STANDARD. Retrieved from https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000259456/lithium-aus-kaernten-betreiber-werben-mit-fragwuerdigen-aussagen
103. Pizzi, S., Moggi, S., Caputo, F., & Rosato, P. (2021). Social media as stakeholder engagement tool: CSR communication failure in the oil and gas sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2094
104. Poelzer (2020). Licensing acceptance in a mineral-rich welfare state: critical reflections on the social license to operate in Sweden. Extr. Ind. Soc., 7, 1096.
105. Poelzer, G., & Yu, S. (2021). All trust is local: Sustainable development, trust in government and legitimacy in northern mining projects. Resources Policy, 70, 101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101888
106. Prno, J. (2013). An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resources Policy, 38(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010
107. Ram, J., & Titarenko, R. (2022). Using Social Media in Project Management: Behavioral, Cognitive, and Environmental Challenges. Project Management Journal, 53(3), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221079427
108. Ranängen, H., & Lindman, Å. (2020). Walk the Talk—A Sustainability Management System for Social Acceptance in Nordic Mining. Sustainability, 12(9), 3508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093508
109. Rathobei, K. E., Ranängen, H., & Lindman, Å. (2024). Exploring broad value creation in mining - Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder management in practice. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101412
110. Red, k. (2023, June 3). Wirtschaft: Keine Lithium-Verarbeitung in Kärnten [Economy: No lithium processing in Carinthia]. ORF.At. Retrieved from https://kaernten.orf.at/stories/3210150/
111. Red, k. (2024, March 17). Wirtschaft: Lithium-Abbau: Weiter Warten auf UVP [Economy: Lithium mining: further wait for EIA]. ORF.At. Retrieved from https://kaernten.orf.at/stories/3249309/
112. Redaktion (2025, February 17). Decision by the Carinthian provincial government confirms: lithium project in Wolfsberg is not subject to an EIA. Mining Report. Retrieved from https://mining-report.de/english/blog/decision-by-the-carinthian-provincial-government-confirms-lithium-project-in-wolfsberg-is-not-subject-to-an-eia/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
113. Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan Risk in society series. London: Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772440
114. Reuters (2022, January 8). Serbia may suspend lithium deal with Rio Tinto - PM Brnabic. Reuters Media. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/serbia-may-suspend-lithium-deal-with-rio-tinto-pm-brnabic-2022-01-08/
115. Reutner, U. (2025, January 13). : Update: Lithium aus Europa: Hürden und Erfolge. Retrieved from https://www.powtech-technopharm.com/de-DE/industry-insights/2024/artikel/lithium-aus-europa
116. (2023). RGF (2023). Environmental impact assessment study for the underground exploitation project of lithium and boron deposits in Jadar. [In Serbian].
117. Richard Parsons, & Kieren Moffat (2014). Constructing the Meaning of Social Licence. Social Epistemology, 28(3-4), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2014.922645
118. Rodolaki (2023a). The role of intercultural differences and challenges faced in negotiating active mine sites'rehabilitation objectives from Africa to Europe. Extr. Ind. Soc., 16.
119. Rodolaki (2023b). Understanding the social license to operate from a cultural perspective: the case studies of Australia, Greece, and India. RawMat, 2023, 3.
120. Rössler, W. (2024, March 8). Wie das weiße Gold der Weinebene verspielt wird [How the white gold of the wine plain is gambled away]. Wiener Zeitung. Retrieved from https://www.wienerzeitung.at/a/wie-das-weisse-gold-der-weinebene-verspielt-wird
121. Rueger, J., Dolfsma, W., & Aalbers, R. (2023). Mining and analysing online social networks: Studying the dynamics of digital peer support. MethodsX, 10, 102005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102005
122. Sadden, E. (2024). Serbia’s government grapples with intense opposition to Rio Tinto’s planned lithium project. Retrieved from https://cilive.com/commodities/metals-mining/news-and-insight/103124-serbia-government-grapples-intense-opposition-rio-tinto-planned-lithium-project?utm_source=chatgpt.com
123. Samson, D., & Swink, M. (2023). People, performance and transition: A case study of psychological contract and stakeholder orientation in the Toyota Australia plant closure. Journal of Operations Management, 69(1), 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1218
124. Sashi, C. M., Brynildsen, G., & Bilgihan, A. (2019). Social media, customer engagement and advocacy. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1247–1272. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2018-0108
125. Sekularac, I., & Vasovic, A. (2021, August 26). Rio Tinto-led plan for major lithium mine stirs protests in Serbia. Reuters Media. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/rio-tinto-led-plan-major-lithium-mine-stirs-protests-serbia-2021-08-26/
126. Souza, R. G., Domingues, A. M., Spindlegger, A., Mair-Bauernfeind, C., & Part, F. (2025). Review of the current knowledge and identified gaps in assessing the social and environmental impacts of mining processes in the Lithium Triangle. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 53, 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.031
127. Srbija.gov.rs (n.d.). Основни подаци. Упознајте Србију [Basic facts. Get to know Serbia.]. Retrieved from https://www.srbija.gov.rs/tekst/45625/osnovni-podaci.php
128. STATISTICS AUSTRIA (2025a, May 17). Demographic indicators. Retrieved from https://www.statistik.at/en/statistics/population-and-society/gender-statistics/demographic-indicators
129. STATISTICS AUSTRIA (2025b, May 17). Demographic indicators (annual data). Retrieved from https://www.statistik.at/en/statistics/population-and-society/population/demographic-indicators-and-tables/demographic-indicators-annual-data
130. STATISTICS AUSTRIA (2025c, May 17). Population by age /sex.
131. Steinbauer, R. (2025, May 16). Der Lithium-Rausch in der Kärntner Weinebene [The lithium rush in the Carinthian Weinebene]. Retrieved from https://www.boersen-kurier.at/allgemein/2018-06/der-lithium-rausch-in-der-kaerntner-weinebene
132. Stenseke, M. (2009). Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.005
133. Stojanovic, M. (2024, July 11). Serbian Court Ruling on Scrapped Lithium Mine Dismays Environmentalists. BIRN. Retrieved from https://balkaninsight.com/2024/07/11/serbian-court-ruling-on-scrapped-lithium-mine-dismays-environmentalists/
134. Sung, K. S., Tao, C.‑W., & Lee, S. (2025). How does dialogic corporate social responsibility communication affect online brand advocacy? The role of other-regarding preferences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124, 103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103950
135. Surucu-Balci, E., Balci, G., & Yuen, K. F. (2020). Social Media Engagement of Stakeholders: A Decision Tree Approach in Container Shipping. Computers in Industry, 115, 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103152
136. Sutterfield, J. S., Friday-Stroud, S. S., & Shivers-Blackwell, S. L. (2006). A Case Study of Project and Stakeholder Management Failures: Lessons Learned. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700504
137. Tcvetkov, P., Cherepovitsyn, A., & Fedoseev, S. (2019). Public perception of carbon capture and storage: A state-of-the-art overview. Heliyon, 5(12), e02845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02845
138. Terwel, B. W., Daamen, D. D., & Mors, E. ter (2013). Not in my Back Yard (NIMBY) Sentiments and the Structure of Initial Local Attitudes Toward CO2 Storage Plans. Energy Procedia, 37, 7462–7463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.689
139. Todorović, I. (2024). Environmentalists dispute Rio Tinto's bid to win strategic status for Jadar lithium project. Retrieved from https://balkangreenenergynews.com/environmentalists-dispute-rio-tintos-bid-to-win-strategic-status-for-jadar-lithium-project/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
140. Todorović, I. (2025, April 11). EU lawmakers urge for rule of law in Jadar lithium project in Serbia. Retrieved from https://balkangreenenergynews.com/eu-lawmakers-urge-for-rule-of-law-in-jadar-lithium-project-in-serbia/
141. Trading Economics (n.d.). Austria Mining Production. Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/austria/mining-production
142. Vadhanasin, V., Ratanakuakangwan, S., & Santivejkul, K. (2017). Social Media in Project Communication Management—A Conceptual Framework. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 581–584. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7262
143. Verein Lavanttaler Wirtschaft (2025, May 15). „Lithiumabbau im Lavanttal – Impulse für das Lavanttal“ von DI Dr. Nik Sifferlinger 29.05.2017 – Verein Lavanttaler Wirtschaft [‘Lithium mining in the Lavanttal - impulses for the Lavanttal’ by DI Dr Nik Sifferlinger 29.05.2017 - Verein Lavanttaler Wirtschaft]. Retrieved from https://www.lavanttaler-wirtschaft.at/2017/06/02/lithiumabbau-im-lavanttal-impulse-fuer-das-lavanttal-von-di-dr-nik-sifferlinger-29-05-2017/
144. Vögele, S., Rübbelke, D., Mayer, P., & Kuckshinrichs, W. (2018). Germany’s “No” to carbon capture and storage: Just a question of lacking acceptance? Applied Energy, 214, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.077
145. Wang, Y., Narula, S., Rai, S., & Sharma, A. (2019). Environmental Awareness and the Role of Social Media. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5291-8
146. Williams, N. L., Ferdinand, N., & Pasian, B. (2015). Online Stakeholder Interactions in the Early Stage of a Megaproject. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21548
147. Wirth, H., Kulczycka, J., Hausner, J., & Koński, M. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication about social and environmental disclosure by large and small copper mining companies. Resources Policy, 49, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.007
148. World Bank (2025, May 15). Serbia – Overview. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/serbia/overview
149. Zarfl, S. (2024, December 19). Gemeinde legt Beschwerde gegen Lithiumabbau ein. Https://www.Kleinezeitung.At. Retrieved from https://www.kleinezeitung.at/kaernten/lavanttal/19191320/gemeinde-legt-beschwerde-gegen-lithiumabbau-ein
150. Zeng, J., Yang, L. T., Lin, M., Ning, H., & Ma, J. (2020). A survey: Cyber-physical-social systems and their system-level design methodology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105, 1028–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.06.034
151. Zhou, Z., Zhou, X., & Qian, L. (2021). Online Public Opinion Analysis on Infrastructure Megaprojects: Toward an Analytical Framework. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000874
152. Zobernig, B. (2023, November 14). Gailtal Journal - Lithium aus Österreich: Hintergründe zum Wolfsberger Lithium-Bergwerk [Gailtal Journal - Lithium from Austria: Background information on the Wolfsberg lithium mine]. Gailtal Journal. Retrieved from https://gailtal-journal.at/allgemein/lithium-aus-oesterreich-hintergruende-zum-wolfsberger-lithium-bergwerk/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Renate Renner, Claudia Mayr-Veselinovic (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
