Security Communication and the Security Dilemma: Insights from the Iran-Israel Rivalry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Keywords:
security dilemma, security communication, Iran-Israel conflict, 12-day war, international securityAbstract
This study explores how security communication, often intended as deterrence or reassurance, can heighten insecurity within enduring rivalries, using the Iran-Israel conflict as a case study. It finds that during the 2025 Twelve-Day War, rhetorical threats, symbolic military gestures, and coercive diplomatic signalling reinforced perceptions of existential threat, deepened mistrust, and escalated the crisis. These communicative patterns illustrate how strategic messaging can construct rather than merely convey threat. In contrast, the Cuban Missile Crisis demonstrates that interpretive clarity and direct diplomatic exchange can mitigate such risks. The study refines the security dilemma framework by positioning communication as a constitutive driver of insecurity rather than merely a reflection of material capabilities. It argues that interpretive transparency, institutionalised backchannels, and sustained dialogue are critical for transforming security communication from an instrument of threat amplification into a means of conflict management. The findings contribute to theoretical debates on the communicative dimensions of security and offer insights for policymakers seeking durable de-escalation mechanisms.
Downloads
References
1. Abd al-Hay, W. (2022, August 2). The security infiltration of Israel in Sub-Saharan Africa. Al-Zaytouna Centre. Retrieved July 9, 2025, from: https://eng.alzaytouna.net/2022/08/02/academic-paper-the-security-infiltration-of-israel-in-sub-saharan-africa/
2. Abo El-Kasem, M. H. (2025, February 9). The Middle East conflict and indications of change in the strategic environment. Journal of International Studies. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/02/The-Middle-East-Conflict-and-Indications-of-Change-in-the-Strategic-Environment.pdf
3. Akerele, T. (2021, October 22). The Iranian revolutionary apparatus and Hezbollah in West Africa. Current Trends in Islamist Ideology. Retrieved July 9, 2025, from: http://hudson.org/node/44280
4. Al Asad, A. (2025). Syria is an arena of competition between regional actors. Конфликтология/Nota Bene, 2, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2025.2.74825
5. Al Jazeera Staff. (2025a, June 15). Israel intercepts Iranian drones amid rising tensions [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved August 10, 2025, from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKM5E8O6FnQ
6. Al Jazeera Staff. (2025b, June 29). Was the Iran war to establish Israel's control over the Middle East? [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved August 10, 2025, from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaSAR_KRhk0
7. Al Jazeera Staff. (2025c, June 18). Mapping Iran's most significant strikes on Israel. Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/18/mapping-irans-most-significant-strikes-on-israel
8. Al Jazeera. (2025a, June 13). What is behind Israel's decision to attack Iran? Al Jazeera. Retrieved August 10, 2025, from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/what-is-behind-israels-decision-to-attack-iran
9. Al Jazeera. (2025b, June 18). Escalation continues between Israel and Iran. Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://liberties.aljazeera.com/en/escalation-continues-between-israel-and-iran
10. Al Jazeera. (2025c, June 23). How extensive are Israel's intelligence operations inside Iran? Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/23/how-extensive-are-israels-intelligence-operations-inside-iran
11. Alessio, D., & Renfro, W. (2022). Building empires literally in the South China Sea: Artificial islands and contesting definitions of imperialism. International Politics, 59(5), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00328-x
12. Amaliya, L. R. (2025, January). A cyber war of Iran-Israel: A geopolitical rivalry. In International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2024) (pp. 45-56). Atlantis Press.
13. Baker, J. (2019). The empathic foundations of security dilemma de-escalation. Political Psychology, 40(6), 1251-1266.
14. BBC. (2025, June 13). Iran's missiles cause multiple casualties after strikes in Israel. BBC News. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c93ydeqyq71t
15. Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
16. Berman, L. (2025, July 6). Report: Iranian ballistic missiles struck five IDF bases during the war. The Times of Israel. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-5-idf-bases-were-struck-by-ballistic-missiles-during-israel-iran-war/
17. Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. J. (2008). The security dilemma: Fear, cooperation, and trust in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Brunnstrom, D., & Martina, M. (2025, June 13). Damage to Iranian nuclear sites so far appears limited, experts say. Reuters. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/damage-iranian-nuclear-sites-so-far-appears-limited-experts-say-2025-06-13/
19. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
20. Cawley, J. (2017). Diplomacy or double-cross. Voices: Journal of Cultural Studies, 3, 112-133.
21. Chenneville, T., Wasilewski, S., Stanz, J., Gardy, S., Pyle, J., & Azamian Jazi, E. (2025). Exploring quantity, quality, content, and impact of sexual orientation and gender identity publications in school psychology: A PRISMA scoping review. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2025.2491374
22. Cornwell, A., Hafezi, P., & Holland, S. (2025, June 13). Iran strikes back at Israel with missiles over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Reuters. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-says-it-strikes-iran-amid-nuclear-tensions-2025-06-13/
23. Ekmektsioglou, E., & Lee, J. Y. (2020). North Korea, missile defense, and the U.S.-China security dilemma. The Pacific Review, 35(4), 587-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1862285
24. Fabian, E. (2025a, June 16). 8 killed, nearly 300 injured as Iranian ballistic missiles strike central Israel, Haifa. The Times of Israel. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://www.timesofisrael.com/8-killed-nearly-300-injured-as-iranian-ballistic-missiles-strike-central-israel-haifa/
25. Fabian, E. (2025b, June 27). ‘The stars aligned’: Why Israel set out for a war against Iran, and what it achieved. The Times of Israel. Retrieved September 10, 2025, from: https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-stars-aligned-why-israel-set-out-for-a-war-against-iran-and-what-it-achieved/
26. Fierke, K. M. (2013). Critical approaches to international security (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
27. Fiveable. (n.d.). Back-channel diplomacy (U.S. history since 1945 key terms). Fiveable Library. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from: https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/united-states-history-since-1945/back-channel-diplomacy
28. Gidron, Y. (2024). Israel and Africa. In the Routledge Handbook on Israel's foreign relations (pp. 352-362). Routledge.
29. Gill, J. H. (2021). Provocation, war, and restraint under the nuclear shadow: The Kargil conflict 1999. In R. Ganguly (Ed.), War and peace in contemporary India. Routledge.
30. Green, J. A., Henderson, C., & Ruys, T. (2022). Russia's attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 9(1), 4-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803
31. Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187
32. Iran International. (2025, July 5). Blackouts return to Iran as post-war strain exposes grid failures. Iran International. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202507051896
33. Jensen, B., & Atalan, Y. (2025, June 13). Iran's options for retaliating against Israel. Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/irans-options-retaliating-against-israel
34. Jervis, R. (2011). Dilemmas about security dilemmas. Security Studies, 20(3), 416-423.
35. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. (1962, October 27). Letter from Nikita Khrushchev to John F. Kennedy, October 27, 1962. Cuban Missile Crisis documents. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from: https://microsites.jfklibrary.org/cmc/oct27/doc4.html
36. Kapur, P. S. (2005). Do nuclear weapons stabilize South Asian militarized crises? Evidence from the 1990 case. Asian Security, 1(2), 174-189.
37. Kim, I., & Park, S. (2019). Deterrence under nuclear asymmetry: THAAD and the prospects for missile defense on the Korean Peninsula. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(2), 165-192.
38. Kim, Y. G., & Martín, F. E. (2021). At the brink of nuclear war: Feasibility of retaliation and the US policy decisions during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 10(2), 125-147. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1042112
39. Kydd, A. H. (2005). Trust and mistrust in international relations. Princeton University Press.
40. Lebow, R. N., Risse-Kappen, T., & Kurzer, P. (1996). International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly, 111(1), 166-166.
41. Lob, E. (2024). Iran is trying to jumpstart economic relations with Africa. International Policy Digest.
42. Lupovici, A. (2021). The dual-use security dilemma and the social construction of insecurity. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(3), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1866845
43. Milton, S. (2019). Syrian higher education during conflict: Survival, protection, and regime security. International Journal of Educational Development, 64, 38-47.
44. New Indian Express. (2025, June 22). US joins Israel's war on Iran: Tehran warns of consequences; Iranian parliament approves plan to close Hormuz Strait. New Indian Express. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from: https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2025/Jun/22/us-joins-israels-war-on-iran-tehran-warns-of-consequences-iranian-parliament-approves-plan-to-close-hormuz-strait
45. Nichols, M. (2025, June 16). Iran tells the UN strikes on Israel are self-defense. Reuters. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-tells-un-strikes-israel-are-self-defense-2025-06-16/
46. Onimisi, T. (2025). Improved security and education: Pathways to national development. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 205–212.
47. Oxford Analytica. (2021). E3-US relations will be crucial for JCPOA survival. Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB258803
48. Petrović, T. (2025). (Re)Constructing Europe: Has a common identity integrated Europe? International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 139–148.
49. Poling, G. B. (2021). A brittle status quo in the South China Sea. In L. Buszynski & D. T. Hai (Eds.), Maritime issues and regional order in the Indo-Pacific (pp. 1-23). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68038-1_1
50. Radchenko, S., & Zubok, V. (2023). Blundering on the brink: The secret history and unlearned lessons of the Cuban missile crisis. Foreign Affairs, 102(1), 44-58.
51. Rolf, S., & Agnew, J. (2016). Sovereignty regimes in the South China Sea: Assessing contemporary Sino-US relations. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(2), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1234403
52. Salman, Y. (2021). The security element in Israel-Africa relations. Strategic Assessment, 24(2), 38-53.
53. Schelling, T. C. (1970). The diplomacy of violence. In J. Garnett (Ed.), Theories of peace and security (pp. 73-91). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15376-3_4
54. Scott, L., & Hughes, R. G. (Eds.). (2015). The Cuban missile crisis: A critical reappraisal. Routledge.
55. Taylor, B. C. (2019). Nuclear deterrence and communication. In B. C. Taylor & H. Bean (Eds.), The handbook of communication and security (pp. 316-341). Routledge.
56. Taylor, B. C., & Bean, H. (Eds.). (2019). The handbook of communication and security. Routledge.
57. Tehran Times. (2025, September 2). Iran is ready for talks, but US missile demands are obstructing progress, says Larijani. Tehran Times. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/517473/Iran-is-ready-for-talks-but-US-missile-demands-are-obstructing
58. The Guardian. (2025, June 22). Donald Trump says the US has attacked three Iranian nuclear sites and ‘totally obliterated’ them. The Guardian. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/21/trump-us-nuclear-strikes-iran
59. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
60. UN News. (2024, September 27). Netanyahu defends Israel at UN; says he came ‘to set the record straight’. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1155031
61. Wæver, O. (1995). Identity, integration and security: Solving the sovereignty puzzle in EU studies. Journal of International Affairs, 389-431.
62. Wæver, O. (2015). The theory act: Responsibility and exactitude as seen from securitization. International Relations, 29(1), 121-127.
63. Wired. (2007, October 22). Cuban Missile Crisis ends with U.S. pledge not to invade Cuba. Wired. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from: https://www.wired.com/2007/10/dayintech-1022
64. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Rashid Gbambu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
