Multi-Actor Deterrence of Small States: The Case of the Republic of Serbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Abstract
The contemporary security context of small states requires a reexamination of classical concepts of deterrence, based on the symmetry of military capabilities and bilateral relations. The paper analyzes multi-actor deterrence as an expanded analytical framework for understanding how small, militarily neutral states manage security risks amid geopolitical uncertainty and hybrid threats. The paper hypothesizes that deterrence in hybrid environments can no longer be understood as a state-centered mechanism, but as a multi-actor system shaped by state, non-state, and corporate actors in multiple domains. The aim of the paper is to develop an analytical framework of multi-actor deterrence applicable to small states. Through a case study of the Republic of Serbia, the paper shows that the deterrent effect does not primarily arise from the threat of force, but from the potential for networking among different actors and multi-domain synergy, which increases the costs and uncertainty of potential aggression. The paper also identifies key challenges to implementing this model, including institutional fragmentation, capacity asymmetry, and external pressures, highlighting the importance of continued management of multi-actor deterrence mechanisms to preserve the strategic autonomy of small states.
Downloads
References
1. Baev, P., Marsh, N., & Martins, B. (2025). Distributed deterrence: Europe’s new security logic and action plan. PRIO Policy Brief, 4. Преузето са https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/592ba438-863d-4237-8831-e7a9aa4245f2/PRIO%20Policy%20Brief%204%202025.pdf?inline=true
2. Beriša, H., Cvetković, V., & Pavić, A. (2024). Implications of Artificial Intelligence and Cyberspace on Risk Management Capabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(2), 279-295. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2024.6.2.18
3. Black, M., & Obradovic, L. (2022). Multi-actor deterrence: defining the concept. Aether (Maxwell Air Force Base Ala), 1(2), 69-80. Downloaded https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AEtherJournal/Journals/Volume-1_Issue-2/Black.pdf
4. Ćurčić, M., & Dinić, J. (2024). Vojna neutralnost i saradnja kao instrumenti za ostvarivanje nacionalnog interesa Republike Srbije. Politika nacionalne bezbednosti, 27(2), 159-181. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/pnb27-50341
5. Cvetković, V. M., & Šišović, V. (2024). Understanding the Sustainable Development of Community (Social) Disaster Resilience in Serbia: Demographic and Socio-Economic Impacts. Sustainability, 16(7), 2620.
6. Cvetković, V. M., Gole, S., Renner, R., Jakovljević, V., & Lukić, T. (2024). Qualitative insights into cultural heritage protection in Serbia: Addressing legal and institutional gaps for disaster risk resilience. Open Geosciences, 16(1), 20220755
7. Cvetković, V. M., Lipovac, M., Renner, R., Stanarević, S., & Raonić, Z. (2025). A Predictive Framework for Understanding Multidimensional Security Perceptions Among Students in Serbia: The Role of Institutional, Socio-Economic, and Demographic Determinants of Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(11), 5030.
8. Cvetković, V. M., Renner, R., & Jakovljević, V. (2024). Industrial Disasters and Hazards: From Causes to Consequences—A Holistic Approach to Resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(2), 149–168.
9. Cvetković, V., Čvorović, M., & Beriša, H. (2023a). The Gender Dimension of Vulnerability in Disaster Caused by the Coronavirus (COVID-19). NBP, 28(2), 32-54.
10. Cvetković, V., Radovanović, M., Milašinović, S. (2021). Disaster Risk Communication: Attitudes of Serbian Citizens. Sociological Review, 55 (4), 1610-1647.
11. Cvetković, V.M., Tanasić, J., Ocal, A., Živković-Šulović, M., Ćurić, N., Milojević, S., Knežević, S. (2023). The Assessment of Public Health Capacities at Local Self-Governments in Serbia. Lex Localis, 21(4), 1201-1234.
12. Despotović, L. (2010). Obeležja geopolitičkog položaja Srbije i srpskih zemalja u kontekstu aktuelnih procesa balkanizacije. Sociološki pregled, 44(4), 541-566.
13. Dingil, H. (2025). Reshaping National Security and the Future of Warfare in the Age of Competitive Artificial Intelligence. Insight Turkey, 27(2), 413–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2025272.21
14. Freedman, L. (2004). Deterrence. Wiley.
15. Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A History. London: Oxford University Press.
16. Fukuda, J. (2024). War 3.0: the Rapid Change of Warfare - Deepening Deterrence in the New (Space and Cyber) Domains. Tokyo: The Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Преузето са https://www.spf.org/en/global-data/user224/war30therapidchangeofwarfare.pdf
17. Gajić, A. (2023). Geopolitički položaj Srbije nakon otpočinjanja rata u Ukrajini - neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje u kriznom kontekstu. Srpska politička misao, 80(2), 53-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/spm80-44267
18. Glišin, V. (2025). Geopolitička obeležja položaja Srbije i srpskog naroda u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima. Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu, 6(2), 103-124. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/napredak6-59395
19. Hew, S. (2013). The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Järvenpää, P., Major, C., & Sakkov, S. (2019). Comprehensive Security in Finland. Helsinki: National Defence University.
21. Keinonen, M. (2024). Deterrence strategies for a small state: Analysis and survey. Journal of Military Studies, 13(1), 67-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2024-0006
22. Keohane, R. (1969). Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.
23. Kuçi, G. (2024). Russia’s hybrid warfare in the western Balkans: geopolitical strategies and proxy actors. Octopus Journal: Hybrid Warfare & Strategic Conflicts, 3(27). doi:https://doi.org/10.69921/29031991
24. Lekić, S. (2017). Neutrality of Serbia and new geopolitical reality. Vojno delo, 69(3), 63 – 73. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1703063l
25. Lović, V., & Stojanović, M. (2024). The relation of the national security system of the Republic of Serbia to modern hybrid threats. Megatrend revija, 21(2), 135-152. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/MegRev2402135L
26. Matthews, R., & Timur, F. B. (2023). Singapore’s ’Total Defence’ Strategy. Defence and Peace Economics, 35(1), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2023.2187924
27. Mazarr, M. (2015). Mastering the Gray Zone: Understanding a Changing Era of Conflict. US Army War College Press.
28. Mazarr, M. (2018). Understanding Deterrence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
29. Meng, W. (2025). Expert Insight-Based Modeling Of Non-Kinetic Strategic Deterrence Of Rare Earth Supply Disruption: A Simulation-Driven Systematic Framework. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(7), 1137-1152. doi:https://doi.org/10.64252/9tsfta55
30. Milenković, D. (2025). Theoretical, institutional and organizational aspects of the integrated disaster risk reduction system: Towards a deeper understanding of disaster resilience in Serbia. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 175–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.13
31. Milenković, D., & Cvetković, V. (2025). Rethinking Disaster Resilience: Conceptual Framework, Core Dimensions, and Key Actors. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 455–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.25
32. Milenković, D., & Cvetković, V. M. (2025). Rethinking Disaster Resilience: Conceptual Framework, Core Dimensions, and Key Actors. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 455–468.
33. Nikolić, N., Cvetković, V. M., Renner, R., Cvijović, N., & Gačić, J. (2025). Disaster Risk Perception and Local Resilience near the ‘Duboko’ Landfill: Challenges of Governance, Management, Trust, and Environmental Communication in Serbia. Open Geosciences, 17(1): 20250850.
34. Ocal, F., & Torun, S. (2025). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Disaster Response Coordination. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 235–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.13
35. Ochmanek, D., Wilson, P., Allen, B., Meyers, J., & Price, C. (2017). U.S. Military Capabilities and Forces for a Dangerous World. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Преузето са https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1700/RR1782-1/RAND_RR1782-1.pdf
36. Pavić, A., & Beriša, H. (2025). Strategic pragmaticity as a factor in achieving serbiaʼs national interests. Serbian Political Thought, 92(4), 25-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/spm92-59186
37. Popović-Mančević, M. (2025). Non-Traditional Roles of Military Actors: NATO’s Engagement in Natural Disaster Response. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 75–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.6
38. Rokvić, V., & Dimitrijević, I. (2025). Bridging Defense Studies and Disaster Risk Reduction: Comparative Perspectives from the Former Yugoslavia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 65–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.5
39. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
40. Snyder, G. (1961). Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of National Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. SSU, S. S. (2025, February 23). Defence Strategies of Small States and Smaller Forces. Преузето January 19, 2026 са Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies: https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/News/Pages/the-defence-strategies-of-small-states-and-smaller-forces-ar.aspx
42. Stošić, L., & Janković, A. (2022). Cybercrime in the Republic of Serbia: prevalence, situation and perspectives. Kultura polisa, 19(4), 82–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.4r.82sj
43. Thorhallsson, B. (2012). Small States in the UN Security Council: Means of Influence? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(2), 135–160.
44. Vidović, N., & Beriša, H. (2025). Economic Aspects of Cyber Security: Socio-Financial Consequences of Cyber Attacks. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 149–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.11
45. Vidović, N., Cvetković, V., Beriša, H., & Milašinović, S. (2025). Understanding Ransomware Through the Lens of Disaster Risk: Implications for Cybersecurity and Economic Stability. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 247–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.141
46. Vračević, N. (2025). Strategic Roles of Private Military Companies: The Evolution and Privatization of Warfare in the Context of Contemporary Global Conflicts. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 163–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.12
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandar M. Pavić, Hatidža A. Beriša (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
