Assassins and Modern Religious Terrorism: Historical Parallels, Theoretical Insights, and Lessons for Terrorism Studies

Authors

  • Milan Lipovac University of Belgrade, Faculty of Security Studies, Gospodara Vučića 50, Belgrade, Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.4

Keywords:

assassins, religious terrorism, political violence, asymmetric warfare, historical analogy

Abstract

This article presents a comparative historical analysis of the medieval Nizari Ismaili Assassins and contemporary religious terrorist organisations. Drawing on terrorism studies theory and historical accounts, the paper explores structural and strategic parallels in ideology, tactics, and objectives between the Assassins—an 11th–13th-century sect renowned for targeted political killings—and modern religiously motivated terrorists. The introduction frames political violence as a recurring phenomenon and posits the value of examining historical cases like the Assassins to enhance understanding of modern terrorism. A review of the literature on Religious Terrorism establishes definitions and provides a theoretical context, particularly regarding Islamic terrorism. The article then provides a detailed historical overview of the Assassins, including their origins, methods of operation, and mythologisation in historical narratives. Against this backdrop, twelve key similarities between the Assassins and contemporary religious terrorists are analysed, including asymmetrical warfare strategy, clandestine organisation, recruitment and indoctrination, the use of martyrdom, and the communicative function of violence. Important differences—especially the Assassins’ relative avoidance of civilian targets—are also highlighted. The conclusion discusses how these comparisons reveal enduring patterns and a degree of strategic rationality in terrorist violence, underscoring the significance of historical analogies for developing a nuanced understanding of religious terrorism and informing future research in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Atran, S. (2021). Psychology of transnational terrorism and extreme political conflict. Annual review of psychology, 72(1), 471-501.

2. Bar, S. (2004). The religious sources of Islamic terrorism. Policy Review, 27 (June/July), 27–37.

3. Bartol, V. (1938). Alamut. Ljubljana: Modra ptica. (Original work published 1938; see also English translation: Bartol, V. (2004). Alamut. Northwestern University Press.)

4. Bell, J. B. (2005). Assassination and Terrorism: Their Place in Political History. In Terror Out of Zion (pp. 17–30). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

5. Burman, E. (1987). The Assassins: Holy Killers of Islam. Wellingborough, UK: Crucible.

6. Chaliand, G., & Blin, A. (Eds.). (2007). The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to al Qaeda. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

7. Crenshaw, M., & LaFree, G. (2017). Countering terrorism. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

8. Dawson, L. L. (2024). Is Religious Terrorism More Dangerous? Perspectives on Terrorism, 18(3), 2–25.

9. Gregg, H. S. (2014). Defining and distinguishing secular and religious terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 8(2), 36–51.

10. Hodgson, M. G. S. (2005). The Secret Order of Assassins: The Struggle of the Early Nizari Ismaʻilis Against the Islamic World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published 1955.)

11. Hoffman, B. (1993). “Holy Terror”: The Implications of Terrorism Motivated by a Religious Imperative. RAND Paper P-7834.

12. Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism (Revised & Expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

13. Jackson, R. (2014). Constructing enemies: “Islamic terrorism” in political and academic discourse. Government and Opposition, 49(2), 500–525.

14. Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

15. Lewis, B. (2003). The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam. London: Phoenix Press. (Original work published 1967.)

16. Moghadam, A. (2007). Mayhem, Myths, and Martyrdom: The Shi'a Conception of Jihad. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19(1), 125-143.

17. Moghadam, A. (2009). Motives for martyrdom: Al-Qaida, Salafi Jihad, and the spread of suicide attacks. International Security, 33(3), 46-78.

18. Nahid, B. (1995). The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Isma‘ilis. Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 26, 129–142.

19. Paz, R. (1998). Is There an “Islamic Terrorism”? Herzliya, Israel: International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism.

20. Polo, M. (2002). The Travels of Marco Polo. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work circa 1300, translated and edited by R. Latham.)

21. Rapoport, D. C. (1984). Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 658–677.

22. Rapoport, D. C. (2004). Modern Terror: The Four Waves. In A. Cronin & J. Ludes (Eds.), Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy (pp. 46–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

23. Rapoport, D. C. (2022). Waves of Global Terrorism: From 1879 to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press.

24. Roy, O. (2017). Jihad and Death: The Global Appeal of Islamic State. London: Hurst & Co.

25. Sageman, M. (2021). The implication of terrorism’s extremely low base rate. In M. Taylor & J. Horgan (Eds.), Ethics and Terrorism (pp. 82–91). London: Routledge.

26. Taylor, D., & Gautron, Y. (2015). Pre-modern terrorism: The cases of the Sicarii and the Assassins. In R. D. Law (Ed.), The Routledge History of Terrorism (pp. 28–40). London: Routledge.

27. Waterson, J. (2008). The Ismaili Assassins: A History of Medieval Murder. London: Frontline Books.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2025

Issue

Section

International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies

How to Cite

Assassins and Modern Religious Terrorism: Historical Parallels, Theoretical Insights, and Lessons for Terrorism Studies (M. . Lipovac , Trans.). (2025). International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.4

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.