The Human Body War: A Strategic Analysis of Internal Conflict Dynamics within States
Keywords:
internal conflict, systems theory, political anatomy, governance resilience, institutional decay, strategic stability, political immunityAbstract
Modern states face increasingly complex challenges that originate not only from external threats but also from internal systemic dysfunctions. This study introduces the “Human Body War” framework as a conceptual analytical model, defining it as a sustained internal struggle among state subsystems that generates instability when institutional coordination breaks down. Rather than treating internal conflict as a series of isolated crises, the framework interprets corruption, disinformation, and institutional decay as interconnected political pathologies that disrupt coordination and feedback among the organs of governance. Adopting an interdisciplinary conceptual approach grounded in systems theory, strategic analysis, and institutional theory, this study develops a theoretical synthesis rather than relying on empirical datasets. It examines how feedback loops, communication flows, and decision-making processes shape the stability or degeneration of the political system. Illustrative examples are incorporated to demonstrate how systemic imbalances translate into observable conflict dynamics. The study argues that resilience and adaptation function as forms of political immunity, enabling states to absorb internal stress and restore equilibrium without structural collapse. It further demonstrates that internal conflict emerges from failures in systemic interaction rather than from isolated institutional weaknesses. The study concludes that sustainable stability arises not from power centralization but from systemic harmony: a balanced interplay among governance, the economy, communication, and civic participation. By framing the state as a living organism, the proposed model provides a diagnostic and analytical tool for understanding internal conflict and informing preventive governance strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2017). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
2. Boin, A., Comfort, L. K., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. University of Pittsburgh Press.
3. Bousquet, A., & Curtis, S. (2011). Beyond models and metaphors: Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558054
4. Buzan, B. (1991). People, states, and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era. Lynne Rienner.
5. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3488799
6. Crenshaw, M. (1981). The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics, 13(4), 379–399.
7. Dahl, R. A. (2008). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
8. Deutsch, K. W. (1963). The nerves of government: Models of political communication and control. Free Press.
9. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
10. Edmond, C., Forku, N. D., & Farag, M. I. H. (2025). The geopolitics of resources: Power, security, and democracy in 21st century Africa. Political Science & Geography Faculty Publications. https://doi.org/10.25776/12ph-7a31
11. Farag, M. I. H., & Tayie, M. S. (2024). Asymmetric security threats: A study of the impact of illegal migration on regional security in the Mediterranean region. Political Science Journal, (68), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.30907/jcopolicy.vi68.752
12. Farag, M. I. H. (2025a). Middle powers in a multipolar world: The case of Turkey’s foreign policy repositioning. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.13
13. Farag, M. I. H. (2025b). Navigating security challenges: Exploring the dynamics of cooperation in the Mediterranean region. Middle East Research Journal, 13(114), 483–538. https://doi.org/10.21608/mercj.2024.257656.1562
14. Farag, M. I. H. (2026a). Addressing asymmetric security threats in the Mediterranean: Facing reality and adaptation strategies. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Economic Studies and Political Science, 11(21), 790–857. https://doi.org/10.21608/esalexu.2025.372816.1299
15. Farag, M. I. H. (2026b). From primacy to fragmented multipolarity: Systemic change through power-conversion channels. Political Issues, (84), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.58298/842026810
16. Farag, M. I. H. (2026c). Reshaping the regional order in the Middle East under the new multipolarity: An analysis in light of structural realism. Journal of Politics and Economics, 30(29), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.21608/jocu.2026.432610.1487
17. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Profile Books.
18. Gurr, T. R. (2016). Why men rebel (40th anniversary ed.). Routledge.
19. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.
20. Horgan, J. (2004). The psychology of terrorism. Routledge.
21. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
22. Jervis, R. (1997). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton University Press.
23. Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2019). Propaganda and persuasion (7th ed.). Sage.
24. Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
25. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
26. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). Elaborating on the “new institutionalism”. In The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
27. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.
28. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Knopf.
29. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
30. Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.
31. Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown.
32. Parsons, T. (1952). The superego and the theory of social systems. Psychiatry, 15(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1952.11022854
33. Putnam, R. D. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
34. Rawls, J. (2017). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097176
35. Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
36. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822399018
37. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
38. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan Farag (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
