Modern Technological Deficiencies in Criminal Investigation Architecture and National Security Crisis in FCT, Abuja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Keywords:
crime, technology, criminal investigation, national security, crisisAbstract
The paper focuses on the deficiencies of scientific technologies in criminal investigation methods and the lack of successful prosecution of perpetrators of crime. Its main objective is to examine the deficit in modern scientific technologies for criminal investigation methods and the danger posed by arresting offenders of the nation’s most heinous crimes in Abuja. The paper was influenced by several external variables, such as scientific innovations, digital surveillance, and institutional strategies. To achieve this objective, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Abuja was identified. The study used both primary and secondary sources to collect data. Primary data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires, while secondary data were obtained from textbooks and online journals. Four hundred respondents were randomly selected from law enforcement agencies and youths in Abuja, of which 388 valid questionnaires were analyzed using Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation (PPMC). A few theories were identified and reviewed, and the Innovation Diffusion theory was adopted as the theoretical framework. It was adopted for its technological innovations in effective security. The data obtained were descriptively analyzed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMC) as the analytical tool. The findings revealed a significant positive relationship between technological innovation and national security crisis (r = 0.44, df = 386, p < 0.05), as well as a stronger significant relationship between digital surveillance and national security crisis (r = 0.84, df = 386, p < 0.05), leading to the rejection of the null hypotheses. The study recommends that policymakers note that effective investigation enhances prosecution, deters criminality, restores public confidence in law enforcement, reduces fear, and strengthens democratic governance. In this sense, technology-driven criminal investigation is not only a security imperative but also a developmental necessity.
Downloads
References
1. Adeleke, J. O. (2010). The basics of research and evaluation tools. Ikeja, Lagos: Somerest Ventures.
2. Alemika, E. E. O. (2021). Police and policing in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. CLEE Foundation.
3. Amnesty International. (2021, April 14). Nigeria: Seven years since Chibok, the government fails to protect children. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/em/latest/press-release/2021/14/nigeria-seven-years-since-chibok-the-government-fails-to-protect-children
4. Awotayo, O. O., Omitola, A., Omitola, B., & Oderinde, S. L. (2023). Intelligence system and national security in Nigeria: The challenges of data gathering. JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations, 14(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.14.2.8
5. Babbie, E. R. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6. Casey, E., & Schatz, B. (2011). Digital investigation. In E. Casey (Ed.), Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers and the internet (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
7. Chukwunka, C. A. C. (2024, November 10–13). Immanent dialectics of 2023 presidential elections and the contradictions of reimagining the future of the youths in Nigeria [Conference presentation]. 29th Annual Nigerian Anthropological and Sociological Practitioners Association (NASA) Conference, Rebuilding Nigeria: Approach to Effective Governance and Social Transformation, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ogun State, Nigeria.
8. Chukwunka, C. A. C. (2025). Hybrid Policing: The New Structure of Policing for Crime Control in Contemporary Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.10
9. Cvetković, V., Noji, E., Filipović, M., Petrović, M. M., Kešetović, Ž., & Ristanović, N. (2018). Public risk perspectives regarding the threat of terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for risk management decision-making for individuals, communities, and public authorities. Journal of Criminal Investigation and Criminology, 69(4), 279–298.
10. Dairo, M. (2017). The connection between national security and communication. Specialty Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(4), 1–11.
11. Ebeh, J. I. (2015). National security and national development: A critique. AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijah.v4i2.1
12. Eke, C., & Adeyemi, M. O. (2025). Public relations and digital technology in tackling insecurity challenges in Nigeria. Top Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16028611
13. Fichman, R. G. (2000). The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. In R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources.
14. Gehl, R., & Plecas, D. (2016). Introduction to criminal investigation: Processes, practices and thinking. New Westminster, BC: Justice Institute of British Columbia.
15. Ismail, S. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2).
16. McRory, S. (2014, May). Introduction to criminal process for inspectors: Compliance assurance learning and development program (p. 43). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Energy Regulator.
17. Metić, A. (2025). The Significance and Role of Police Officers in Building the School as a Safe Environment for All Students. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.2
18. Morris, B. (2007). Criminal investigation. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation. New York, NY: William Publishing Ltd.
19. Nossen, A. R. (1995). The seventh basic investigative techniques: Analysing financial transactions in the investigation of organised crimes and white-collar crime targets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20. Obiezu, K. (2023, April 6). The scourge of kidnapping for ransom. THISDAY. Retrieved from https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2025/02/16/the-scourge-of-kidnapping-for-ransom/
21. Obioha, R. (2019). Rising criminality and challenges of crime reporting. University of Nigeria Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1).
22. Odeh, A. M., & Umoh, N. (2015). State policing and national security in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1). Rome, Italy: MUSER Publishing.
23. Okoli, A. C., & Lenshie, N. E. (2018). Internal security crises and public order management in Nigeria. African Security Review, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2018.1420506
24. Olowonihi, A. P., & Musa, M. O. (2024). The role of intelligence in Nigeria’s national security: A critical assessment (2011–2023). The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 6(11), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume06Issue11-08
25. Orhero, A. E. (2020). Human security: The key to enduring national security in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law.
26. Orjinmo, N. (2021, March 2). Nigeria’s school abductions: Why children are being targeted. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56212645.
27. Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2010). Criminal investigation: A method for reconstructing the past (6th ed.). New York, NY: Anderson Publishing.
28. Popović Mančević, M. (2025). Non-Traditional Roles of Military Actors: NATO’s Engagement in Natural Disaster Response. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.6
29. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
30. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
31. Saxena, G., & Kumar, S. (2021). Biometric forensic tools for criminal investigation. In G. Shrivastava, D. Gupta, & K. Sharma (Eds.), Cyber crime and forensic computing: Modern principles, practices, and algorithms (pp. 85–110). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110677478-005.
32. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Strom, K. (2017). Research on the impact of technology on policing strategy in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
34. Tong, S., Bryant, R. P., & Horvath, M. A. H. (2009). Understanding criminal investigation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
35. Umeobika, C. Q., & Udegbunam, A. C. (2023). The police and crime investigation in Nigeria: An appraisal. African Journal of Criminal Law and Jurisprudence, 8, 49–55.
36. USCIRF. (2024). Religious freedom conditions in Nigeria. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Wani, T. A., & Ali, S. W. (2015). Innovation diffusion theory: Review and scope in the study of adoption of smartphones in India. Journal of General Management Research, 3, 101–118.
38. World Bank. (2022). Digital transformation and security sector reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Clement A.C. Chukwunka (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
