Revolutionary Identity and Nuclear Bargaining: How Symbolic Legitimacy Restructures Utility in Iran’s Nuclear Program
Keywords:
nuclear bargaining, revolutionary legitimacy, symbolic legitimacy, identity-embedded utility, Iran’s nuclear program, coercive diplomacyAbstract
Why do some nuclear disputes persist despite severe economic coercion and repeated negotiation opportunities? Existing rationalist models assume materially fixed preferences and predict convergence under sufficient pressure. Yet the Iranian nuclear case reveals persistent bargaining rigidity even under escalating sanctions. This article advances a theoretical correction: revolutionary legitimacy can transform the internal composition of state utility by embedding symbolic payoffs alongside material security incentives. When strategically salient technologies become discursively fused with sovereignty and resistance narratives, concessions threaten not only capability but also ideological authority. The article develops a four-step causal mechanism linking legitimacy anchoring, discursive embedding, symbolic payoff generation, and bargaining rigidity. Using process tracing and systematic discourse analysis of Iranian nuclear episodes from 2003–2020, the study demonstrates that escalation and negotiation breakdowns align more closely with legitimacy stress and identity reinforcement than with shifts in material leverage. Comparative application to North Korea strengthens external plausibility by replicating the mechanism under similar ideological conditions. The findings reconceptualize audience costs as functions of ideological coherence rather than electoral accountability and challenge models that treat preferences as materially exogenous. Nuclear bargaining in revolutionary regimes cannot be understood without incorporating identity-embedded symbolic utility.
Downloads
References
1. Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
2. Albright, D., Burkhard, S., Faragasso, S., & Stricker, A. (2025). Analysis of IAEA Iran verification and monitoring report—May 2025. Institute for Science and International Security.
3. Arms Control Association. (2010, March 5). Iran raising uranium-enrichment level. Arms Control Today. Retrieved from https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2010-03/iran-raising-uranium-enrichment-level.
4. Arslan, M., Mustafa, D. G., & Liaqat, D. B. B. (2025). The emergence of Juche ideology in North Korea: From self-reliance principle to a threat for regional and global stability. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(2), 1336–1343.
5. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
6. European External Action Service. (2020, July 14). Saving the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/saving-iran-nuclear-deal_und_en.
7. European External Action Service. (2025, August 28). Statement by the High Representative on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/statement-high-representative-kaja-kallas-joint-comprehensive-plan-action-jcpoa_en.
8. Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592.
9. Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414.
10. Golmohammadi, V. (2018). The foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Prospects for change and continuity. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 8(1), 93–102.
11. Halliday, F. (2005). The Middle East in international relations: Power, politics and ideology. Cambridge University Press.
12. Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: Identities and foreign policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.
13. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2004, November 26). Communication dated 26 November 2004 received from the Permanent Representatives of France, Germany, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United Kingdom concerning the agreement signed in Paris on 15 November 2004 (INFCIRC/637). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/2004/infcirc637.pdf.
14. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2005, September 24). Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Resolution adopted on 24 September 2005 (GOV/2005/77). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/documents/gov2005-77.pdf.
15. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2007, August 30). Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Report by the Director General (GOV/2007/48). Retrieved from https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Iran%20GOV200748.pdf.
16. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2009, November 16). Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran (GOV/2009/74). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/documents/gov2009-74.pdf.
17. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018, November 12). Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 2231 (2015) (GOV/2018/47). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/documents/gov2018-47.pdf.
18. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2025, May 31). Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 2231 (2015): Report by the Director General (GOV/2025/24). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/25/06/gov2025-24.pdf.
19. Iran Primer. (2022, February 17). Khamenei on nuclear program, talks. United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved from https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2022/feb/17/khamenei-nuclear-program-talks.
20. Islamic Republic of Iran. (1989). Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1979, rev. 1989). Retrieved from https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Iran_1989.
21. Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
22. Keohane, R. O. (2017). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
23. Morrow, J. D. (1994). Game theory for political scientists. Princeton University Press.
24. Moshirzadeh, H. (2007). Discursive foundations of Iran's nuclear policy. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 521–543.
25. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2025, June 24). NATO’s nuclear deterrence policy and forces. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50068.htm.
26. Porel, T. (2025). A nuclear policy framework: Identifying challenges and ways to solutions. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.2.
27. Powell, R. (1990). Nuclear deterrence theory: The search for credibility. Cambridge University Press.
28. Ruggie, J. G. (2002). Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalization. Routledge.
29. Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press.
30. Schirazi, A. (1997). The constitution of Iran: Politics and the state in the Islamic Republic. I.B. Tauris.
31. United Nations Security Council. (2006, December 23). Resolution 1737 (2006). Retrieved from https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/s/res/1737-%282006%29.
32. United Nations Security Council. (2010). Resolution 1929 (2010). Retrieved from https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/s/res/1929-%282010%29.
33. Valadbaygi, K. (2025). Unpacking the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA): Internationalisation of capital, imperial rivalry and cooperation, and regional power agency. Politics, 45(2), 202–222.
34. Waltz, K. N. (1996). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
35. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mostafa Hetteh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.
