The Delphi Method in Security Threat Assessment: Principles, Applications, and Methodological Challenges

Authors

  • Josef Smolík Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Department of Security Studies Author
  • Ivana Olecká Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Department of Security Studies Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/

Keywords:

Delphi method, security threats, expert assessment, strategic decision-making, military planning

Abstract

This methodological review examines the Delphi method as an approach to structured expert judgement for the assessment of security threats and its potential application in defence-related decision-making. The paper is based on a narrative methodological review of the literature synthesising the principal methodological concepts, variants, procedures, strengths, limitations, and representative applications of the Delphi method in defence and security research. Particular attention is devoted to methodological requirements for expert selection, consensus assessment, uncertainty communication, and the interpretation of expert judgements in complex security environments. The article further illustrates the practical application of the method through a hypothetical Delphi study protocol and an accompanying threat assessment matrix developed for illustrative purposes. The principal contribution of the paper lies in integrating general Delphi methodology with the specific methodological and organisational challenges of defence and security research. The review concludes that the Delphi method provides a valuable framework for structuring expert judgement under conditions of uncertainty; however, its findings should be interpreted as conditional expert assessments that require careful methodological design and, where possible, validation through empirical evidence or complementary analytical approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Josef Smolík, Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Department of Security Studies

    An associate professor at the Department of Security Studies, Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague. He studied political science, psychology, and social pedagogy at Masaryk University. His expertise lies in criminology, security studies, radical political parties, political psychology, and youth subcultures. He is the author of over 200 academic articles and (co-)author of 17 academic monographs (e.g., Youth Subcultures: Sociological, Psychological, and Pedagogical Aspects, 2017; Psychology of Terrorism and Radicalization: How Lambs Become Wolves, 2020; New Political Parties in the Party Systems of the Czech Republic, 2022, The Internal Security in the Visegrad Group, 2025)

  • Ivana Olecká, Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague, Department of Security Studies

    Assistant Professor at the Department of Criminology, Faculty of Security and Law, Police Academy of the Czech Republic in Prague. She studied sociology and journalism and completed her doctoral studies in the field of social medicine. As a recognized expert in research methodology, she focuses on the study of social deviations. Her research addresses topics such as child violent deaths, characteristics of offenders, parental resilience, social risk factors, and care for specific groups.  She is a member of the Czech Sociological Association of Masaryk (MČSS), the Czech Criminological Association, and the Association of Counsellors for the Bereaved. She has an extensive publishing record, having authored numerous monographs and scientific articles, many of which are indexed in Web of Science and Scopus.

References

1. Al-Qutaish, R. E. (2025). Delphi Method: A Comprehensive Literature Review. International Journal of Software Engineering, 12(1), 1–15.

2. Beriša, H., Cvetković, V., & Pavić, A. (2024). Implications of Artificial Intelligence and Cyberspace on Risk Management Capabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2024.6.2.18

3. Buckley, C. (1995). Delphi: A methodology for preferences more than predictions. Library Management, 16(7), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129510093737

4. Buřita, L. (2003). Prognostické metody a jejich využití v resortu MO. Obrana a strategie, 3(1), 47–60.

5. Clyne, B., Sharp, M. K., O’ Neill, M., Pollock, D., Lynch, R., Amog, K., … Tricco, A. C. (2024). An international modified Delphi process supported updating the web-based ‘right review’ tool. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 170, 111333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111333

6. Cvetković, V. M., Lipovac, M., Renner, R., Stanarević, S., & Raonić, Z. (2025). A Predictive Framework for Understanding Multidimensional Security Perceptions Among Students in Serbia: The Role of Institutional, Socio-Economic, and Demographic Determinants of Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(11), 5030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115030

7. Danics, Š., Smolík, J., & Strnad, Š. (2024). Aspekty bezpečnostní politiky (1st ed.). Praha: Policejní akademie České republiky v Praze.

8. Disman, M. (2008). Jak se vyrábí sociologická znalost: Příručka pro uživatele. Praha: Karolinum.

9. Ferjenčík, J. (2000). Úvod do metodologie psychologického výzkumu: Jak zkoumat lidskou duši. Praha: Portál.

10. Fischer, R. G. (1978). The Delphi method: A description, review and criticism. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 4(2), 64–70.

11. Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (2005). The Delphi technique. In D. H. Sprenkle & F. P. Piercy (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 238–253). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

12. Galatík, V. (Ed.). (2008). Principy obrany České republiky “2030”. Brno: Univerzita obrany.

13. Gordon, T. J. (2009a). Real-time Delphi. In J. C. Glenn & T. J. Gordon (Eds.), Futures research methodology (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: The Millennium Project. Retrieved from https://www.millennium-project.org/publications/futures-research-methodology-version-3-0-2/

14. Gordon, T. J. (2009b). The Delphi method. In J. C. Glenn & T. J. Gordon (Eds.), Futures research methodology (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: The Millennium Project. Retrieved from https://www.millennium-project.org/publications/futures-research-methodology-version-3-0-2/

15. Hayes, N. (2022). Základy sociální psychologie (8th ed.; I. Štěpaníková, Trans.). Praha: Portál.

16. Helmer, O. (1967). Analysis of the future: The Delphi method. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2008/P3558.pdf

17. Hendl, J., & Remr, J. (2017). Metody výzkumu a evaluace (1st ed.). Praha: Portál.

18. Holcr, K. (2009). Kriminologie. Praha: Leges.

19. Jorm, A. (2025a). Origins and uses of the Delphi method. In A. Jorm, Using the Delphi method to establish expert consensus (pp. 1–19). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-8357-4_1

20. Jorm, A. (2025b). Using the Delphi method to establish expert consensus: A practical guide. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-8357-4

21. Khodyakov, D., Grant, S., Denger, B., Martin, A., Peay, H., & Coulter, I. (2020). Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 13(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00389-4

22. Khodyakov, D., Grant, S., Kroger, J., Gadwah-Meaden, C., Motala, A., & Larkin, J. (2023). Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009

23. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Advanced Book Program.

24. Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Delphi Studies. In B. M. Wildemuth, Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (2nd ed., pp. 81–90). Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.

25. Mančić, T. (2025). Climate Change as a Security Challenge, Risk and Threat of the 21st Century and Its Consequences on Critical Infrastructure. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.14

26. Manski, C. F. (2007). Identification for prediction and decision. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

27. Mareš, M. (2014). Vybrané predikce terorismu. In R. Svatoš & J. Kříha (Eds.), II. kriminologické dny (pp. 125–133). České Budějovice: Česká kriminologická společnost & Vysoká škola evropských a regionálních studií.

28. Markmann, C., Darkow, I.-L., & Von Der Gracht, H. (2013). A Delphi-based risk analysis—Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9), 1815–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.019

29. Nasa, P., Jain, R., & Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116

30. Nekolová, M. (2006a). Metoda Delphi. In M. Potůček (Ed.), Manuál prognostických metod (1st ed., pp. 180–186). Praha: Slon.

31. Nekolová, M. (2006b). Participativní metody. In M. Potůček (Ed.), Manuál prognostických metod (1st ed., pp. 28–44). Praha: Slon.

32. Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

33. Olecká, I., & Ivanová, K. (2010). Metodologie vědecko-výzkumné činnosti (1st ed.). Olomouc: Moravská vysoká škola Olomouc. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/el/phil/podzim2015/MVK_23/um/54991882/Metodologie_vedecko-vyzkumne_cinnosti.pdf

34. Olivero, M. A., Bertolino, A., Dominguez-Mayo, F. J., Matteucci, I., & Escalona, M. J. (2022). A Delphi study to recognize and assess systems of systems vulnerabilities. Information and Software Technology, 146, 106874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106874

35. Önnered, S., Johansson, P. E., Stefan, I., & Fundin, A. (2025). Emerging threats to energy security—A Delphi study. Energy Policy, 206, 114735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114735

36. Parízek, M., & Ditrych, O. (2019). Předpovědní metody. In V. Beneš & P. Drulák (Eds.), Metodologie výzkumu politiky (pp. 229–254). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).

37. Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, Md., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017). Developing Policy Scenarios for Sustainable Urban Growth Management: A Delphi Approach. Sustainability, 9(10), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101787

38. Plămădeală, C. (2025). From Operational Experience to Predictive Models: A Decision Tree Approach to Traveler Risk Assessment at Border Crossing Points. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.8

39. Plamínek, J. (2008). Vedení lidí, týmů a firem: Praktický atlas managementu (3., aktualiz. a rozš. vyd). Praha: Grada.

40. Porel, T. (2025). A Nuclear Policy Framework: Identifying Challenges and Ways to Solutions. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.2

41. Preble, J. F. (1983). Public sector use of the Delphi technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(83)90072-0

42. Redmiles, E. M., Acar, Y., Fahl, S., & Mazurek, M. L. (2017). A summary of survey methodology best practices for security and privacy researchers. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.13016/M22K2W

43. Reichel, J. (2009). Kapitoly metodologie sociálních výzkumů. Praha: Grada Publishing.

44. Robson, M. (1995). Skupinové řešení problémů (1st ed.). Praha: Victoria Publishing.

45. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7

46. Sablatzky, T. (2022). The delphi method. Hypothesis: Research Journal for Health Information Professionals, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.18060/26224

47. Šenovský, P. (2021). Modelování rozhodovacích procesů (5th ed.). Ostrava: VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava. Retrieved from https://fbiweb.vsb.cz/~sen76/data/uploads/skripta/modelovani_5vyd.pdf

48. Sitlington, H., & Coetzer, A. (2015). Using the Delphi technique to support curriculum development. Education + Training, 57(3), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0010

49. Smolík, J. (2011). Využití delfské metody ve zpravodajské činnosti: Popis, aplikace, silné a slabé stránky metody. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

50. Smolík, J. (2018). Prognostics methods of security phenomena. Vojenské rozhledy, 27(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.3849/2336-2995.27.2018.01.03-24

51. Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2016). Superprognózy: Umění a věda předpovídání budoucnosti (F. Drlík, Trans.). V Brně: Jan Melvil Publishing.

52. Weisbord, M. R., & Janoff, S. (2010). Future search: Getting the whole system in the room for vision, commitment, and action (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

53. Williamson, K. (2002). The Delphi method. In Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals (pp. 209–220). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-876938-42-0.50020-4

54. Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/rrph-t210

55. Zelinka, P. (2010). Prediktivní metodologie ve zpravodajských službách. Vojenské Rozhledy, 19(1), 29–39.

Published

05.08.2026

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies (First Online - Accepted Papers)

Section

International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Josef Smolík, Ivana Olecká (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By submitting a manuscript to the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:

  1. Author Rights and Ownership

    • Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
    • Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.

  2. Licensing and Open Access Policy

    • The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
    • Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.

  3. Originality and Permissions

    • The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
    • If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.

  4. Author Warranties

    • By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
    • The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.

  5. Editorial and Publication Rights

    • The International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
    • If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.

By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.

How to Cite

Smolík, J., & Olecká, I. (2026). The Delphi Method in Security Threat Assessment: Principles, Applications, and Methodological Challenges. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18485/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.